single-leg medial drop landing with trunk lean includes improper body mechanics related to anterior cruciate ligament injury risk: A comparison of body mechanics between successful trials and failed trials in the drop landing test among female basketball athletes.

BACKGROUND: Improper body mechanics during landing is a typical risk factor of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Drop landing test is used to evaluate landing mechanics by observing not only successful trials but also failed trials. Leaning of the trunk, which is frequently observed during failed trials, may lead to improper body mechanics related to anterior cruciate ligament injury. This study aimed to elucidate the mechanisms of landing with trunk lean that may underlie the risks of anterior cruciate ligament injury by comparing body mechanics between failed and successful trials. METHODS: Participants were 72 female basketball athletes. The athletic task was single-leg medial drop landing, and the body mechanics was recorded by a motion capture system and force plate. Participants fixed the landing pose for ≥3 s in successful trials but failed to do so in failed trials. FINDINGS: Failed trials included the large lean of trunk. There were significant changes in thoracic and pelvic leans at initial contact in failed trials with medial trunk lean (p < 0.05). Kinematics and kinetics during the landing phase in failed trials were associated with the risks of anterior cruciate ligament injury. INTERPRETATION: These findings suggest that landing mechanics with trunk lean involves many biomechanical factors related to anterior cruciate ligament injury and demonstrates the inappropriate pose of trunk from the dropping phase. Exercise programs aimed at the landing manoeuver without trunk lean may contribute to reduce the risks of anterior cruciate ligament injury in female basketball athletes.

THE INFLUENCE OF HIP STRENGTH ON KNEE KINEMATICS DURING A SINGLE-LEGGED MEDIAL DROP LANDING AMONG COMPETITIVE COLLEGIATE BASKETBALL PLAYERS.

BACKGROUND: A smaller knee flexion angle and larger knee valgus angle during weight-bearing activities have been identified as risk factors for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. To prevent such injuries, attention has been focused on the role of hip strength in knee motion control. However, gender differences in the relationship between hip strength and knee kinematics during weight-bearing activities in the frontal plane have not been evaluated. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of hip strength on knee kinematics in both genders during a single-legged landing task in the frontal plane. The hypotheses were that 1) subjects with a greater hip strength would demonstrate larger knee flexion and smaller knee valgus and internal rotation angles and 2) no gender differences would exist during the single-legged landing task. METHODS: Forty-three Japanese collegiate basketball players (20 males, 23 females) participated in this study. Three-dimensional motion analysis was used to evaluate knee kinematics during a single-legged medial drop landing (SML). A hand-held dynamometer was used to assess hip extensor (HEXT), abductor (HAB), and external rotator (in two positions: seated position [SHER] and prone [PHER]) isometric strength. Spearman rank correlation coefficients (ρ) were determined for correlations between hip strength and knee kinematics at initial contact (IC) and peak (PK) during SML (p < 0.05). RESULTS: Negative correlations were observed between the knee valgus angle at IC and HEXT (ρ = -0.48, p = 0.02), HAB (ρ = -0.46, p = 0.03) and PHER (ρ = -0.44, p = 0.04) strength in females. In addition, a significant positive correlation was observed between the knee flexion angle at PK and HEXT strength (ρ = 0.61, p = 0.004) in males. CONCLUSIONS: Significant correlations between hip strength and knee kinematics during SML were observed in both genders. Hip strength may, therefore, play an important role in knee motion control during sports activities, suggesting that increased hip strength may help to prevent non-contact ACL injuries in athletes of both genders. Moreover, gender-specific programs may be needed to control abnormal knee motion, as the influence of hip strength on knee kinematics may differ based on gender. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Evidence of validity for the Japanese version of the foot and ankle ability measure.

CONTEXT: The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) is a valid, reliable, and self-reported outcome instrument for the foot and ankle region. OBJECTIVE: To provide evidence for translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Japanese version of the FAAM (FAAM-J). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Collegiate athletic training/sports medicine clinical setting. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-three collegiate athletes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): All participants completed the Activities of Daily Living and Sports subscales of the FAAM-J and the Physical Functioning and Mental Health subscales of the Japanese version of the Short Form-36v2 (SF-36). Also, 19 participants (23%) whose conditions were expected to be stable completed another FAAM-J 2 to 6 days later for test-retest reliability. We analyzed the scores of those subscales for convergent and divergent validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability. RESULTS: The Activities of Daily Living and Sports subscales of the FAAM-J had correlation coefficients of 0.86 and 0.75, respectively, with the Physical Functioning section of the SF-36 for convergent validity. For divergent validity, the correlation coefficients with Mental Health of the SF-36 were 0.29 and 0.27 for each subscale, respectively. Cronbach α for internal consistency was 0.99 for the Activities of Daily Living and 0.98 for the Sports subscale. A 95% confidence interval with a single measure was ±8.1 and ±14.0 points for each subscale. The test-retest reliability measures revealed intraclass correlation coefficient values of 0.87 for the Activities of Daily Living and 0.91 for the Sports subscales with minimal detectable changes of ±6.8 and ±13.7 for the respective subscales. CONCLUSIONS: The FAAM was successfully translated for a Japanese version, and the FAAM-J was adapted cross-culturally. Thus, the FAAM-J can be used as a self-reported outcome measure for Japanese-speaking individuals; however, the scores must be interpreted with caution, especially when applied to different populations and other types of injury than those included in this study.